• Teodora Antonia MARIȘ



Since ancient times, the aim has been to shape the perceptions, attitudes and behaviors of internal and external audiences. Changes in the technological sphere, specific to the current century, have contributed to the discovery of new methods to more efficiently achieve these behavioral, perceptual or attitudinal changes among the targeted audience segments.

The purpose of this article is to describe the specificity of cultivation theory and to highlight the basic characteristics and efficiency of using selective targeting. The article also includes an example where you can see the methods used in the 21st century in the online environment.


Keywords: cultivation theory; selective targeting; social networks;online environment; persuasion; influence.



Bârgăoanu A., #Fake news, Noua cursă a înarmării, Evrika Publishing House, Bucharest, 2018.
Balmas M., When Fake News Becomes Real: Combined Exposure to Multiple News Sources and Political Attitudes of Inefficacy, Alienation, and Cynicism. Communication Research, 2014.
Bourdieu P., Despre televiziune, Meridiane Publishing House, Bucharest, 1998.
Buluc Ruxandra, ”Perception and intelligence analysis. Belifes, mindsets and their cognitive consequences”, Strategy changes in security and international relations, Volume 3, „Carol I” National Defence University Publishing House, Bucharest, 2014.
Daase C., National, societal and human security: on the transformation of political language, Historical Social Research, 2010.
Dominick J., Ipostaze ale comunicării de masă. Media în era digitală, Comunicare.Ro publishing, Bucharest, 2009.
Galloway L., Engstrom E., & Emmers-Sommer T.M., ”Does Movie Viewing Cultivate Young People's Unrealistic Expectations About Love and Marriage?”, Marriage & Family Review, 51(8), 2015.
Gerbner George, Gross Larry, Morgan Michael, Signorelli Nancy, Shanahan James, Growing Up with Television: Cultivation Processes, Editura B. Jennings, Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, New Jersey, SUA, 2002.
Goffman E., Viaţa cotidiană ca spectacol,, Bucharest, 2003.
Goffman E., Forms of talk, University of Pennsylvania, London, 1981.
Goffman E., Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Harper and Row, London,1974.
Habermas J., Sfera publică şi transformarea ei structurală,, Bucharest, 2005.
Lippmann W., Opinia publică,, Bucharest, 2009.
Mccombs M., ”A Look at Agenda-setting: Past, Present and Future”, Journalism Studies, 6(4), 2005.
Morgan M., Shanahan J., ”The State of Cultivation”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 2010.
Nicu Alexandra, Dinamica familială în cinematografia din România: tipare. Un studiu comparativ al filmelor din perioada comunistă și cea post-comunistă, Doctoral Dissertation, National School for Political and Administrative Studies, Bucharest, 2017.
Ruggiero T.E., Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 2000.
Scheufele D.A., Tewksbury D., Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 2007.
Sundar S., Limperos A.M., ”Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New Media”, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(4), 2003.
Topor Sorin, Terorismul cibernetic, Editura Top Form, Bucharest, 2019.
Vlăduțescu Ș., Convicțiune, persuasiune, comunicare jurnalistică negativă (eseu de hermeneutică mediatică), Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 2006.
Wingfield N., Isaac M., Benner K., ”Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites”, New York Times, 2016.
Zagan C., Discurs și putere. Valențe ale autonomiei discursului în filosofia lui Michael Foucault, Doctoral Dissertation, Alexandru I. Cuza University, Faculty for Political Sciences, Iași, 2016.