SECURITY CULTURE INDICATORS. KEY ISSUES TO MEASURING SECURITY CULTURE AND SOME METHODOLOGICAL CAUTIONS
Abstract: Although security studies have strong roots in sociology and other social sciences, they sometimes fail to take advantage of useful topics and methodologies that are mainstream knowledge for social scientists. Public security culture (and the efforts to measure it) is one of these subjects that could be better “exploited” by security studies scholars using classic sociological instruments.
Keywords: security culture; security studies; methodology; sociological survey; IR theory.
Almond, Gabriel; Verba, Sidney, 1. The Civic Culture – Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Sage Publications, New York, 1963.
Berger, Peter L.; Luckmann, Thomas, 2. The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor Books, New York, 1966.
Buzan, Barry; Waever, Ole; De Wilde, Jaap, 3. Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, London:,1998.
Buzan, Barry, 4. Popoarele, statele şi teama – o agendă pentru studii de securitate internaţională în epoca de după războiul rece, Editura Cartier, Chişinău, 2000.
Katzenstein, Peter J., 5. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press, New York, 1996.
Mărginean, Ioan, 6. Proiectarea cercetării sociologice, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 2000.
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.