Using Agile Project Methodologies in Military Action Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-25-32Keywords:
Agile Methodologies, Scrum, Kanban, Project, Military Operations, Planning.Abstract
To improve the responsiveness and adaptability of decision-makers in the ever-changing and unpredictable world of contemporary military operations, flexible and adaptable approaches to planning are essential. Originally created for software development, Agile approaches offer a new way to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of planning in the military context through the use of project management. This study examines the application of Agile concepts - such as collaboration, flexibility, and iteration - to the planning of military operations. This study highlights the advantages and challenges of applying these concepts in a military setting, emphasising how they can improve strategic adaptability and rapid response times. Focusing on their development, fundamental ideas and various project management applications, the study summarises the body of research on Agile approaches. The main focus of the paper is on the way in which Agile frameworks such as Scrum and Kanban can be adapted for use in military contexts, emphasising teamwork, customer satisfaction and continuous improvement. Key studies show that by encouraging greater cooperation and adaptability, Agile approaches dramatically improve project performance in dynamic contexts. However, obstacles such as reluctance to adapt, lack of qualified staff and problems in scaling Agile methods are also reported.
References
Abercrombie, Erick, Patrick Fullbright, and Seth Long. 2016. Analysis of the Marine Corps Supply Management Unit’s Internal Operations and Effect on the Warfighter. MBA Professional Report, Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1030643.pdf.
Agile Manifesto. 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. https://agilemanifesto.org/.
Alaidaros, Hamzah, Mazni Omar, and Rohaida BT Romli. 2021. “The State of the Art of Agile Kanban Method: Challenges and Opportunities.” Independent Journal of Management & Production 12 (8). doi:10.14807/ijmp.v12i8.1482.
Budden, Phil, Fiona Murray, Isaac Rahamim, Dylan Brown, and Nick Setterberg. 2021.
Kessel Run: An Innovation Opportunity for the U.S. Air Force. Mission Innovation Working Paper, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://innovation.mit.edu/assets/Kessel-Run.pdf.
Cebon, Peter, and Danny Samson. 2012. Diggerworks: Driving Innovation and Effectiveness in the Defence Sector – A Study of Success Factors. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Chung, Lawrence, and Brian Nixon. 2013. Mission-Oriented Agile Software Development. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center.
Daraojimba, Emmanuel Chibuike, Chinedu Nnamdi Nwasike, Abimbola Oluwatoyin Adegbite, and Chinedu Alex Ezeigweneme. 2024. “Comprehensive Review of Agile Methodologies in Project Management.” Computer Science & IT Research Journal 5 (1): 190-218. doi:10.51594/csitrj.v5i1.717.
Kanban University. 2021. The Official Kanban Guide. Seattle, WA: Mauvius Group Inc. https://resources.kanban.university/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Official-Kanban-Guide_A4.pdf.
Kniberg, Henrik, and Mattias Skarin. 2010. Kanban and Scrum: Making the Most of Both. InfoQ Mini Book Series, C4Media Inc. https://www.agileleanhouse.com/lib/lib/People/HenrikKniberg/anbanAndScrumInfoQVersionFINAL.pdf.
Orlov, Evgeniy Vladimirovich, Tatyana Mikhailovna Rogulenko, Oleg Alexandrovich Smolyakov, Nataliya Vladimirovna Oshovskaya, Tatiana Ivanovna Zvorykina, Victor Grigorevich Rostanets, and Elena Petrovna Dyundik. 2021. “Comparative Analysis of the Use of Kanban and Scrum Methodologies in IT Projects.” Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance 9 (4): 693-700. doi:10.13189/ujaf.2021.090415.
Rigby, Darrell, Jeff Sutherland, and Andy Noble. 2018. “Agile at Scale.” Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/05/agile-at-scale.
Schwaber, Ken, and Jeff Sutherland. 2020. The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum:The Rules of the Game. https://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2020/2020-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf.
Šmite, Darja, Javier Gonzalez-Huerta, and Nils Brede Moe. 2018. “When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do: Cultural Barriers to Being Agile in Distributed Teams.” Blekinge Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49392-9_10.
Supriyadi, Arip, Moeljadi, Adi Kusumaningrum, and Susilo. 2023. “The VUCA of Strategic Environment in the Defence Planning of Indonesian Marine Corps.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 17 (2): 40-52.
Toroi, George-Ion, and Cristian-Octavian Stanciu. 2023. “Aspecte privind planificarea acțiunilor de inducere în eroare la nivel operativ.” Gândirea Militară Românească (nr. 3): 20-45.
Tudose, Cătălin. 2021. “Agile Methodology and War Strategies.” Journal of Systemics,Cybernetics and Informatics 19 (8): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.54808/JSCI.19.08.95.
U.S. Air Force. 2019. The Air Force is becoming more agile – one project at a time. https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1823609/the-air-force-is-becomingmore-agile-one-project-at-a-time/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.
BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY