Methodological Approaches in Military Science Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-32Keywords:
methodology;, military sciences;, research methods;, research strategy, scientific research.Abstract
Scientific research is a prerequisite for progress in all areas of society, and military science is no exception. However, its specificities require careful analysis in order to identify specific methodological approaches to ensure the added value of the results obtained. Moreover, the need for continuous transformation and adaptation of military structures to the operating environment and to the specific characteristics of contemporary armed conflicts leads to an increased interest in identifying innovative solutions in this field. Academic research is the approach to provide feasible and viable solutions to these challenges. However, there are relatively few works that address the methodological peculiarities specific to the field of military science. For this reason, the present article analyses how to organize and conduct scientific studies in the military field, proposing a structured framework of methodological approach in 14 steps to ensure the logical coherence of the approach, while highlighting the specificities of the field under analysis.
References
AJP-01. 2022. Allied Joint Doctrine, Edition F, Version 1. NATO Standardization Office.
Barno, David, and Nora Bensahel. 2020. Adaptation under Fire. How Militaries Change in Wartime. Oxford University Press.
Birks, Melanie, and Jane Mills. 2015. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Londra: SagePublications.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research – a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage Publications.
Collis, Jill, and Roger Hussey. 2021. Business Research a practical guide for students.5th edition. London: Macmillan Education Limited.
Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. 2023. Research design. Qualitative, Quantitative,and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Given, Lisa M. 2008. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Vol. 1&2.California: Sage Publications.
Hennink, Monique, Inge Hutter, and Ajay Bailey. 2020. Qualitative Research Methods.London: Sage Publications.
Howitt, Dennis. 2019. Introduction to qualitative research methods in psychology. 4th edition.Pearson.
Johannesson, Paul, and Erik Perjons. 2014. An Introduction to Design Science. Springer International Publishing.
Leavy, Patricia. 2023. Research Design - Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches, ediția a doua. NewYork: The Guilford Press.LibraryThing. 2024. MDS 355. https://www.librarything.com/mds/355.
Moser, Albine, and Irene Korstjens. 2018. “Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part3: Sampling, data collection, and analysis.” European Journal of General Practice 24 (1).
Palazzo, Albert. 2023. “ Land Warfare: An Introduction for Soldiers, Sailors, Aviators and Defence Civilians.” Australian Army Occasional Paper No. 14 (Australian ArmyResearch Centre).
Piehler, G. Kurt. 2013. Encyclopedia of Military Science. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Ross, Paula T., and Nikki L. Bibler Zaidi. 2018. “Limited by our limitations.” Perspectives onmedical education 8 (4): 261-264. doi:10.1007/s40037-019-00530-x.
Ryan, Mick. 2022. War Transformed. The Future of Twenty-First-Century Great PowerCompetition and Conflict. Annapolis, Maryland: US Naval Institute Press.
Saunders, Mark N.K., Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2019. Research Methods forBusiness Students. 8th edition. Pearson Education.
Scipanov, Lucian Valeriu, and Florin Nistor. 2020. “Aspects of scientific research in militarysciences.” PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14th INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE 949-955.
Turabian, Kate L. 2018. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations.9th Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
US Marine Corps. 2020. MCDP 7 Learning. Washington DC: US Department of the Navy.https://www.marines.mil/News/Publications/MCPEL/Electronic-Library-Display/Article/2129863/mcdp-7/.
Wang, Xiaofeng, and Cheng Zhenshun. 2020. “Cross-sectional studies: strengths,weaknesses, and recommendations.” Chest, 158 (1).
Žukauskas, Pranas, Jolita Vveinhardt, and Regina Andriukaitienė. 2018. “Philosophy andparadigm of scientific research.” Management culture and corporate social responsibility(IntechOpen Limited) 121 (13): 506-518.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.
BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY 
