Open Systems Theory in Organizations and Geopolitics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-29Keywords:
Open Systems Theory;, Geopolitics;, Geoeconomics, Westphalian Order;, Medieval Era.Abstract
This paper presents a theoretical approach exploring the application of Open Systems Theory within geopolitics. Traditionally, geopolitics has focused on state-centric power dynamics; however, the increasing influence of non-state actors such as multinational corporations, and transnational networks has blurred the boundaries between states and other global entities. By employing Open Systems Theory, this paper offers a new conceptual framework to understand the complex and interconnected nature of modern international relations. The study ultimately argues that Open Systems Theory provides a nuanced perspective essential for analyzing the evolving dynamics of global politics.
References
Almeida, P., H. Porto, G. Romay, and M. Gouvea. 2023. ”The growing participation of international organizations and non-state actors in international litigation: An empirical map of the International Court of Justice.” Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, 127. https://doi.org/10.9732/2023.v127.968.
Ansell, C. K., and S. Weber. 1999. ”Organizing International Politics: Sovereignty and Open Systems.” International Political Science Review 20(1): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512199201004.
Ashmos, D. P., and Huber, G. P. 1987. ”The Systems Paradigm in Organization Theory: Correcting the Record and Suggesting the Future.” Academy of Management Review 12(4): 607-621.
Bertalanffy, L. 1972. ”The history and status of general systems theory.” Academy of Management Journal, 15(4): 407-426.
Beven, K. 2006. ”A manifesto for the equifinality thesis.” Journal of Hydrology 320 (1-2):18-36.
Bump, N. 2023. ”The Slowly Boiling Frog: External State Actors and 21st Century Hemispheric Challenges.” Hemisferio Revista Del Colegio Interamericano de Defensa (vol. 9): 24–50. https://doi.org/10.59848/24.1207.hv9n2.
Burns, T., and G.M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications. Cummings, T. G., and C.G. Worley. 2016. Organization development and change (10th ed.).Cengage Learning.
Daft, R. L. 2015. Organization Theory and Design (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Emery, F.E., and E.L. Trist. 1965. ”The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments.”Human Relations 18(1): 21-32.
Freeman, D. 2024. ”Sovereignty, human rights and the regulation of transnational corporations: a critical spatial analysis of civil society proposals for a binding treaty.” Globalizations, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2353993.
Galbraith, J. R. 1998. Designing Organizations: An Executive Guide to Strategy, Structure, and Process. Jossey-Bass.
Hofbauer, J. A. 2023. ”Not Just a Participation Trophy? Advancing Public Interests through Advisory Opinions at the International Court of Justice.” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 22(2): 234–272. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-bja10092.
Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.Keren, M. 1979. ”Ideological implications of the use of open systems theory in political science.” Behavioral Science, 24(5): 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830240504.
Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, J. W. 1967. ”Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 12(1): 1-47.
Luhmann, N. 2006. ”System as difference.” Organization 13(1): 37-57.
Mazis, I., and Troulis, M. 2019. ”Systemic Geopolitical Analysis and Structural Realism: Parallel Routes and Common Challenges.” IOSR Journal of Business and Management 21(10):1-6. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2110010106.
Moloney, K., and T. Legrand. 2024. ”Actors, alterations, and authorities: three observations of global policy and its transnational administration.” Policy & Society, 43(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae003.
Montuori, A. 2011. Systems approach. In The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (pp. 741-746). Sage Publications.
Nahavandi, A., R.B. Denhardt, J.V. Denhardt, and M.P. Aristigueta. 2015. Organizational behavior. SAGE Publications.
Prabhukar Luitel. 2024. ”Role of Non-State Actors in National Security.” Unity Journal 5(1),57–75. https://doi.org/10.3126/unityj.v5i1.63160.
Reiners, N. 2021. Transnational Lawmaking Coalitions for Human Rights. Cambridge University Press.
Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5th ed.). PrenticeHall.
Zaitsev, Stanislav. 2023. ”Political implications of the activities of TNCs: Current trends and impact on the concepts of power, legitimacy and sovereignty.” Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriâ 25. Meždunarodnye Otnošeniâ I Mirovaâ Politika 15(2): 35–64.
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2023-15-2-35-64.
Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Wilkinson, D. 2011. The ambiguity advantage: What great leaders are great at. Palgrave Macmillan.
Weber, K., and D. Waeger. 2017. ”Organizations as Polities: An Open Systems Perspective.” Academy of Management Annals 11(2): 886–918. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0152.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.