The theory of the regional security complex — Case study, the riparian states of the Black Sea

Authors

  • Adrian GHENADE Academia Națională de Informații Mihai Viteazul, București, România
  • Elena ONU National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-14

Keywords:

Black Sea, security complex theory, poststructuralism, Copenhagen School, NATO, security.

Abstract

Known in Antiquity as the Pontus Euxinus, the Black Sea has been the bridge between European and Eastern civilizations since ancient times. Possessing a multi-varied mosaic of cultures, the Black Sea area has facilitated over the centuries, both the development of commercial and political relations and the maintenance and production of conflicts, being like the Sword of Damocles. Located at the intersection of three security zones (Euro-Atlantic, Russian, and Eastern), the Black Sea is currently a vulnerable space in terms of security. Heir to Byzantine culture, most of the riparian states have a complicated internal and external policy, being caught between the idealism of the Western world and the realism of the Eastern European space. At the same time, the revisionism of the Russian Federation and Turkey in terms of foreign policy will also mean a change in the dynamics of the relations between the states bordering the Black Sea, which could result either in its return to the status of a Russian lake or in a division of the spheres of influence between the Russian Federation and Turkey. In this sense, in order to analyze the future security dynamics of the riparian states, we used the theory of the regional security complex, which we consider very appropriate in our study of the Black Sea region.

References

Britannica. 1936. „Montreux Convention.” https://www.britannica.com/event/Montreux-Convention.

Buzan, Barry. 1983. People, States and Fear: National Security Problem in International Relations. Marea Britanie: Wheatsheaf books Ltd.

Cojocaru, Marius George. 2014. NATO și Marea Neagră. Târgoviște: Cetatea de Scaun.

Curtifan, Tudor. 2018. „Abhazia și Osetia de Sud, recunoscute de Siria. Georgia, replică imediată.” https://www.defenseromania.ro/abhazia-i-osetia-de-sud-recunoscute-de-siria-georgia-replica-imediata_591759.html#google_vignette.

Davis, Anna. 2015. „The 2015 Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation.” U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 10-11.

Dinu, Leonardo. 2020. “The Crimean Aircraft Carrier. RUSSIAN FEDERATION MILITARIZATION OF THE BLACK SEA.” New Strategy Center. https://www.newstrategycenter.ro/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FLANKS-Policy-Brief-The-Crimean-Aircraft-Carrier.-Russian-Federation-Militarization-of-the-Black-Sea.pdf.

Smith, Dr.M.A. 2020. Russian Foreign Policy 2000: The Near Abroad. Camberley, Anglia: The Conflict Studies Research Centre.

The Senate of the United States. 2023. „S.804 ¨– Black Sea Security Act of 2023.” To provide for security in the Black Sea region, and for other purposes. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/804/text.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-08

How to Cite

GHENADE, A. ., & ONU, E. . (2024). The theory of the regional security complex — Case study, the riparian states of the Black Sea. BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY, 13(1), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-14

Issue

Section

Articles