Disinformation Dynamics Unveiling the Impact of Echo Chambers in Shaping Online Public Opinion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-09Keywords:
disinformation, echo chamber, cognitive biases, filter bubble, polarizing, fake-news manipulation, social networks.Abstract
The proliferation of misinformation and the emergence of echo chambers in the online environment pose significant challenges to modern democracies, directly impacting public opinion and social behaviors. This study focuses on the analysis of a Facebook group centered around a prominent Romanian political figure, boasting 93,800 members and averaging ten daily posts. Using advanced machine learning and AI-based hate speech detection, the study uncovers systematic echo chamber construction and the amplification of misinformation. The findings emphasize the influence of online echo chambers on public opinion and underscore the need to maintain information integrity in the media landscape and communication. This research has important implications for scholars, policymakers, and media practitioners, indicating the critical need to address the challenges posed by misinformation and echo chambers in the online environment.
References
Akhtar, P., A.M. Ghouri, H.U.R. Khan, M.A.U. Haq, U. Awan, N. Zahoor, Z. Khan and A. Ashraf. 2023. “Detecting fake news and disinformation using artificial intelligence and machine learning to avoid supply chain disruptions.” Annals of Operations Research 327: 633-657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-05015-5.
Arguedas, A.R., C.T. Robertson, R. Fletcher and R.K. Nielsen. 2022. “Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review.” Reuters Institute. doi:10.60625/risj-etxj7k60.
Barberá, P. 2020. „Social Media, Echo Chambers and Political Polarization.” In Social media and democracy. The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, editors Nathaniel Persily and Joshua A. Tucker, 34-55. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/socialmedia-and-democracy/social-media-echo-chambers-and-political-polarization/333A5B4DE1B67EFF7876261118CCFE19.
Benkler, Y., R. Farris and H. Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001.
Braddock, K. 2022. “Vaccinating against hate: Using attitudinal inoculation to confer resistance to persuasion by extremist propaganda.” Terrorism and Political Violence 34 (2): 240-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1693370.
Brennen, J.S. 2019. “Misinformation: The evidence on its scope, how we encounter it, and our perceptions of it.” Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/misinformation-evidence-its-scope-how-we-encounter-itand-our-perceptions-it.
Bruns, A. 2019. “Filter bubble.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426.
Ceron, Wilson and Mathias-Felipe de-Lima-Santos. 2023. “Disinformation Echo Chambers on Facebook.” In Fighting Fake Facts, 61-90. MDPI Books. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-1347-8-4.
Ciampaglia, G.L., F. Menczer and TheConversationUs. 2018. “Biases Make People Vulnerable to Misinformation Spread by Social Media.” Scientific American.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/biases-make-people-vulnerable-tomisinformation-spread-by-social-media/.
Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi and Michele Starnini. 2021. “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (9): e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
Daskalopoulos, A., N. Hernandez, F. Jason, H. Jenvey, D. Gustafson, R. Mosley, C. Rodriguez, N. Schoonover and S. Townsend. 2021. “Thinking outside the bubble: Addressing polarization and disinformation on social media.” CSJS Journalism Bootcamp. https://journalism.csis.org/thinking-outside-the-bubble-addressing-polarization-and-disinformation-on-social-media/.
Donis, L. 2021. „How to filter bubbles and echo chambers reinforce negative beliefs and spread misinformation through social media.” Debating Communities and Networks XII. https://networkconference.netstudies.org/2021/2021/04/25/how-filter-bubbles-and-echo-chambers-reinforce-negative-beliefs-and-spread-misinformation-through-social-media/.
Garrett, R.K. 2009. “Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.
He, L., S. Hu and A. Pei. 2023. “Debunking Disinformation: Revolutionizing Truth with NLP in Fake News Detection.” https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16328.
Horner, G.C., D. Galletta, J. Crawford and A. Shirsat. 2021. “Emotions: The Unexplored Fuel of Fake News on Social Media.” Journal of Management Information Systems 38 (4): 1039-1066. doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1990610.
Knuutila, A., L.M. Neudert and P.N. Howard. 2022. “Who is afraid of fake news? Modeling risk perceptions of misinformation in 142 countries.” Misinformation Review, Harvard Kennedy School. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/who-is-afraid-of-fake-news-modeling-risk-perceptions-of-misinformation-in-142-countries/.
Lewandowsky, S., U.K.H. Ecker and J. Cook. 2017. “Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6 (4): 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
Murphy, G., C. De Saint Laurent, M. Reynolds, O. Aftab, K. Hegarty, Y. Sun and C.M. Greene. 2023. “What do we study when we study misinformation? A scoping review of experimental research (2016-2022).” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/what-do-we-study-when-we-study-misinformation-a-scoping-review-of-experimental-research-2016-2022/.
Nikolov, D., D.F.M. Oliveira, A A. Flammini and F. Menczer. 2015. “Measuring online social bubbles.” PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.38.
Nisbet, E.C. and O. Kamenchuk. 2019. “The Psychology of State-Sponsored Disinformation Campaigns and Implications for Public Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy14 (2): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-11411019.
O’Shaughnessy, N. 2020. „From disinformation to fake news: forwards into the past.” În The SAGE Handbook of Propaganda, pp. 55-70. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526477170.
Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2029079.
Ruiz, C. Diaz and T. Nilsson. 2023. “Disinformation and Echo Chambers: How Disinformation Circulates on Social Media Through Identity-Driven Controversies.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 42 (1): 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391562.
Sunstein, C.R. 1999. “The Law of Group Polarization.” (John M. Olin Program in L. & Econ. Working Paper No. 91). https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/13030952/The%20Law%20of%20Group%20Polarization.pdf.
Travierso, M. 2021. “Measuring magnetism: how social media creates echo chambers.” Nature Italy. https://www.nature.com/articles/d43978-021-00019-4.
Vosoughi, S. and S. Arala. 2018. “The spread of true and false news online.” Science 359 (6380): 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.
Walter, S., M. Brüggemann and S. Engesser. 2018. “Echo Chambers of Denial: Explaining User Comments on Climate Change.” Environmental Communication 12 (2): 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394893.
Wollebæk, D., R. Karlsen, K. Steen-Johnsen and B. Enjolras. 2019. “Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers: The Emotional Basis for Online Behavior.” Social Media + Society 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119829859.
Woolley, S.C. and P. Howard. 2016. “Automation, algorithms, and politics/ Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents – Introduction.” International Journal of Communication (10). https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6298/1809.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.