Revisiting Naval Conceptualism with reference to Corbett and Mahan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-23-49Keywords:
Naval Conceptualism, maritime strategy, Julian Corbett, Alfred Mahan, naval training, naval supremacy, naval control.Abstract
This article revisits age-old tested naval conceptualism provided by Corbett and Mahan, and critiques as offered by Booth, Gray, Grove, Jones, Rubel, Sestak, Till and Turner. Examples are presented with reference to Israel as a small to medium state and the larger maritime powers of Britain, China, Russia, and the United States. The need arises because naval warfare is linked to and dependent upon technological innovations. Nuclear propulsion, missiles, drones and cyber have changed the nature of warfare and coastguard capability. The roles of naval fleets have also changed in both defense, deterrence, and the offense due to new situations exampled by the Cold War, and asymmetric battles against violent and extremist organizations post 9/11. This has value for cadet training in the heritage of the profession, and the development of abstract considerations for a broad philosophical appreciation of naval and maritime affairs applicable when they become junior and inexperienced offices in planning, deployment, and operation. And beyond to ensure decisions and actions are a combination of experience and knowledge.
References
Adamsky, D. 2010. The Culture of Military Innovation: The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Revolution in Military Affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Armstrong, B. 2022. “Mahan Versus Corbett in Width, Depth, and Context.” Military Strategy Magazine 7(4): 16-21.
Barak, O. 2021. “From Decision to Victory: Resolving the Confusion in Israeli Military Terminology.” INSS Strategic Assessment 24(2): 19-37.
Benbow, T. 2007. “Maritime Forces and Counter-Insurgency.” Contemporary Security Policy 28(1): 80-95.
Booth, K. 1997. Navies and Foreign Policy. New York: Croom Helm Ltd.
__. 1985. Law, Force and Diplomacy at Sea. Winchester, Mass.: Allen & Unwin.
Bowers, I. and Koh, S. L. C. 2019. Grey and white hulls: An international analysis of the navycoastguard nexus. London: Springer.
Buffaloe, D.L. 2006. Defining Asymmetric Warfare. Washington D.C: AUSA’s Institute of Land Warfare.
Chorev, S. 2017. “Security and energy in the Eastern Mediterranean: An Israeli perspective” in Stohs, J. and Brugs, S. (eds). Maritime Security in the Eastern Mediterranean. Kiel: Sea Power Series.
Clark, B. and Sloman, J. 2016. Advancing Beyond the Beach: Amphibious Operations in an Era of Precision Weapons. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment.
Corbett, J. S. 1997. Some Principles of Maritime Strategy and his England in the Seven Years’ War. Republished Newport RI: Naval War College.
Cordesman, A.H. 2006. Preliminary “Lessons” of the Israeli-Hezbollah War. Washington D.C:Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Drennan, B.J. 2023. “Beyond Navies, Beyond Defense: The Case for a United States Maritime Department” in Overton. J. (ed) Seapower by Other Means. Baden Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Editorial. 2022. “Israel completes testing naval Iron Dome.” Globes. https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-israel-completes-testing-naval-iron-dome-1001430385
Eiran, E. 2021. “Israel: Traditional Approaches to Securitizing the Maritime Domain” in Bueger, C., Edmunds, T. and McCabe, R. (eds). Capacity Building for Maritime Security. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Erickson, A.S. and Chase, M. 2010. “Informatization and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy” in Saunders, P.C. (ed.). The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs.
European Fisheries Control Agency. 2023 Coast Guard Functions. https://www.efca.europa.eu/en/content/coast-guard-functions
Fabian, E. 2022. “Israeli Navy wraps up ‘complex’ submarine exercise in Red Sea.” The Times of Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-navy-wraps-up-complex-submarineexercise-in-red-sea/
Frese, S. J. 2020. “Nikita Khrushchev’s Journey into America.” The Annals of Iowa 79(1): 109-111.
Goldrick, J. and Hattendorf, J. B. 1993 Mahan is not enough. The Proceedings of a conference on the works of Sir Julian Corbett and Admiral Sir Herbert Richmond. Newport RI: Naval War College.
Gough, B.M. 1988. “Maritime strategy: The legacies of Mahan and Corbett as philosophers of sea power.” The RUSI Journal 133(4): 55-62.
Gray, C. S. 1992. The leverage of sea power: the strategic advantage of navies in war. London: Maxwell Macmillan.
__. 1994. The navy in the post-Cold war world: The uses and Value of strategic sea Power. University Park PA: Penn State Press.
Global Fire Power – GFP. 2023. Navy Fleet Strength by Country. https://www.globalfirepower.com/navy-ships.php
Groll-Yaari, Y. 1998. “Defining Terrorism” in Wolfson, M. (ed). The Political Economy of War and Peace. Recent Economic Thought Series, Volume 64. Boston MA: Springer.
Grove, E. 1998. “Principles on Maritime Strategy” in Grove, E. and Hore, P. (eds.) Dimensions of Sea Power: Strategic Choice in the Modern World. Yorkshire: The University of Hull Press.
Gustafson, K. 2019. “Intelligence success and failure: the human factor.” International Affairs 95(2): 483–485.
Handel, M. I. 2000. “Corbett, Clausewitz, And Sun Tzu.” Naval War College Review 53(/4): 106-124.
Heller, C.H. 2019. “The Impact of Insignificance: Naval Developments fom The Yom Kippur War,” Cimsec. https://cimsec.org/the-impact-of-insignificance-naval-developmentsfrom-the-yom-kippur-war/
Helfont, S. 2022. “The New Israeli Navy: Capabilities, Limitations, and Opportunities.” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 16(1): 53-63.
Holmes, J.R and Yoshihara, T. 2015. “The Influence of Mahan upon China’s Maritime Strategy.” Comparative Strategy 24(1): 23-5.
Hunt, B. D. 1982. Sailor-Scholar: Admiral Sir Herbert Richmond 1871-1946. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.
__. 1984. “The Outstanding Naval Strategic Writers of the Century.” Naval War College Review 37(5): 86–107.
Inbar, E. 1998. “The Israeli Navy.” Naval War College Review 43(1): 100-112.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2017. The Global State of Democracy 2017 Exploring Democracy’s Resilience, 2017 Figure 1.1. https://www.idea.int/gsod-2017/files/IDEA-GSOD-2017-CHAPTER-1-EN.pdf
Israel Navy Web Site. 2023. https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/israeli-navy/
Jones, S. B. 1955. “Global Strategic Views.” Geographical Review 45(4): 492–508.
Jordan, D., J. D. Kiras, D. J. Lonsadale, I. Speller, C. Tuck and C. D. Walton. 2016. Understanding modern warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kane, T. M. 2016. Chinese grand strategy and maritime power. New York: Psychology Press.
LaGrone, S. 2016. “CNO Richardson: Navy Shelving A2/AD Acronym.” USNI News. https://news.usni.org/2016/10/03/cno-richardson-navy-shelving-a2ad-acronym
Mahan, A. T. 1890. The Influence of Seapower on History. Gutenberg: Gutenberg. Org.
__. 1911. “Letter from Mahan to Meyer 1 February 1911” Letters and Papers, Printed in Hearings Before the House Naval Affairs Committee, 61st Congress, 3d session, 1911. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
Marshall, A. 2021. “What is a Blue-Water Navy?” Boot Camp Military Fitness Institute. https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2021/01/12/what-is-a-blue-water-navy/
Metaparti, P. 2010. “Rhetoric, rationality and reality in post-9/11 maritime security.” Maritime Policy & Management 37(7): 723-736.
Ministry of Defence. 2017. “UK Maritime Power, Chapter 3 – The foundations of maritime power” in Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power. Swindon, Wiltshire: Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, 5th edition.
Money, S.W. 2023. Tac Talks: Cognitive Dissonance in Constabulary Operations. https://www.navy.gov.au/media-room/publications/tac-talks-16
Nistor, F. and Scipanov, L.V. 2014. “Aspects of maritime power projection on land.” Strategies XXI(2): 2-9.
O’Lavin, B. 2009. Mahan and Corbett on Maritime Strategy. Newport RI: Naval War College.
Ozberk, T. 2022. “Russia’s Amphibious Operation Dilemma.” NavalNews. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/03/russias-amphibious-operation-dilemma/
Robinson, J. 1996. “Tomahawk launch breaks submarine silence.” Defense Daily Website. https://web.archive.org/web/20150904024907/, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-18652189.html
Rossiter, M. 2007. Sink the Belgrano. London: Bantam Press.
Rowlands, K. 2012. “Decided Preponderance at Sea-Naval Diplomacy in Strategic Thought.” Naval War College Review 65(4): 89–106.
__. 2018. Naval Diplomacy in 21st Century: A Model for the Post-Cold War Global Order. London: Routledge.
Segell, G. 2022. “Israel’s natural gas sector’s first year with the Chevron Corporation.” Israel Affairs 28(5): 661-679.
__. 2023. Revisiting the Montreux Convention of 1936 in light of the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine. https://trendsresearch.org/insight/revisiting-the-montreuxconvention-of-1936-in-light-of-the-current-conflict-between-russia-and-ukraine/
Sestak, J. 2021. “The U.S. Navy Loss of Command of the Sea to China and how to Regain it, The Strategist.” Texas National Strategic Review 4(1): 147-164.
Sloan, E. C. 2022. Revolution in Military Affairs. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
Speller, I. 2018. Understanding naval warfare. London: Routledge.
Sprance, W.R. 2004. “The Russo-Japanese war: the emergence of Japanese imperial power.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 6(3): 1-24.
Till, G. 1984. Maritime Strategy and the Nuclear Age. Hong Kong: The Macmillan Press.
__. 2006. The Development of British Naval Thinking. London: Routledge.
__. 2013. Seapower: A guide for the twenty-first century. Oxon: Routledge.
__. 2018. Seapower: A guide for the twenty-first century. 4th edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Turner, S. 1974. “Missions of the US Navy.” Naval War College Review 6(5): 2–17.
__. 1990. “Intelligence for a new world order.” Foreign Affairs 70(150): 27-39.
UK Defence Council. 2004. The Fundamentals of British Maritime Doctrine: BR 1806, London: HMSO.
U.S. Department of the Navy. 1992. From the Sea: Preparing the Naval Service for the 21st Century. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1992/november/seapreparing-naval-service-21st-century
Vego, M. 2009. Naval Classical Thinkers and Operational Art. Newport RI: The Naval War College.
Widen, J.J. 2007. “Sir Julian Corbett and the Theoretical Study of War.” Journal of Strategic Studies 30(1): 109-127.
__. 2009. “Julian Corbett and the Current British Maritime Doctrine.” Comparative Strategy28(1): 170-185.
Woodall, S.R. 1985. Strategic Forecasting in Long-Range Military Force Planning: With an Application to the Naval Case. Catholic University of America: Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.
BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY 
