Legal and ethical aspects of the synchronization of military and non-military activities in multi-domain operations





war;, operation;, multi-domain;, law;, legal;, moral;, synchronisation


The evolution of war and armed conflicts in contemporary society and in the foreseeable future requires deep reflection not only on the physiognomy of the confrontation but also on rethinking the ways of adapting the forms and procedures of military action to the requirements of international law, principles, and norms concerning the protection of victims, different categories of persons, and material and cultural assets. “Multi-domain operations” have a considerably increased potential for generating combined destructive effects achieved with means of combat based on new technologies. By synchronizing military and non-military activities, this mixing can, in turn, generate consequences that may fall under the law of armed conflict. In this context, our aim in this material is to identify some aspects that reflect the need to synchronize multi-domain operations with the legal regulations and ethical conditions necessary for conducting contemporary military conflicts.


A patra convenție de la Haga. 1907. “Convenţia privind legile şi obiceiurile războiului pe uscat.” 18 oct.


Congressional Research Service. 2022. “Defense Primer: Army Multi-Domain Operations Cucinschi, Alexandru-Lucian. 2021. „Impactul operației multi-domeniu asupra strategiei militare.” Gândirea Militară Românească 144.

DefenceNews. 2022. Multidomain operations concept will become doctrine this summer.

March 24.

Garn, Alex R. 2019. Multi-Domain Operations: The Army’s Future Operating Concept for Great Power Competition. Fort Leavenworth, KS: US Army Command and General Staff College.

Guvernul României. 2005. Strategia națională a României de aplicare a dreptului internațional umanitar. București.

Hedrick, Bryan. 2018. “First to Fight for the “Right”: The Ethical Dilemma Inherent Within the Multi-Domain Battle Concept.” Small Wars Journal.

Ioniță, Crăișor-Constantin. 2022. Societatea postindustrială și inteligența artificală. Provocări și oportunități din perspectiva securității naționale și a NATO privind dezvoltarea conceptului operație multidomeniu. București: Editura Universității Naționale de Apărare „Carol I”.



Leon, Jose Diaz de. 2021. “Understanding Multi-Domain Operations in NATO.” The Three Swords Magazine (NATO Joint Warfare Centre) (37): 91.

Milley, Mark A. 2018. “The U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028.” TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1 i. Ministerul Apărării Naționale. 2021a. Carta Albă a Apărării. București.

—. 2021b. “Strategia militară a României.” București.

NATO Standardization Office. 2022. “AJP-01. Allied Joint Doctrine.” Edition F, Version 1. data/file/1128191/AJP-01_EdF_V1.pdf.

Organizația Națiunilor Unite. 1945. Carta Națiunilor Unite. San Francisco.

Retter, Lucia, Alex Hall, James Black, and Nathan Ryan. 2016. The moral component of cross-domain conflict. Cambridge: Rand Corporation.

UK Ministry of Defence. 2020. ”Joint Concept Note 1/20 Multi Domain Integration.” https://

—. 2021. “Integrated Operating Concept.”

US Department of the Army. 2022. “FM 3.0. Operations.”

Uscoi, Nicolae and Gabriel Oprea. 1999. Introducere în Dreptul Internațional Umanitar.București: Editura Cartega




How to Cite

SÎRBU (RADUSLAV), L. . (2023). Legal and ethical aspects of the synchronization of military and non-military activities in multi-domain operations. BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY, 12(1), 163–171.