JOINT OPERATIONS – THE CONTINUITY OF A FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENT

Authors

  • Alexandru CUCINSCHI
  • Ion CHIORCEA ”Mircea cel Bătrân” Naval Academy, Constanța

Keywords:

: joint;, joint operation;, threat;, security environment

Abstract

With the emergence of the notion of multi-domain, all the elements that until now have been associated with the notion of joint, be it battle, operation or formation (in the sense of structure) have become associated with this new fashionable notion, which seems that it tends to replace the older notion of joint. However, we appreciate that the notion of joint should lose neither the importance it has had up to now, in the sense of a concept that has been applied and proved functional, shaping to a large extent the development of the military instrument of power, nor the possible evolutions of this concept, given the solid ground on which are now those who have implemented a joint mode of operation. Thus, in this article we aim at highlighting the main reasoning that have led to the emergence and application of this concept (joint) until now, then describing the current security environment and its implications on the operational level; later we will propose a completion of the joint operations, so that it can be applied under current and future threats.

References

Brownlee, Romie L., and William J. Mullen III. 1988. Changing an Army. An Oral History of General William

E. DePuy, USA Retired. https://history.army.mil/html/books/070/70-23/CMH_Pub_70-23.pdf.

Carafano, James J. PhD. 2018. “America’s Joint Force and the Domains of Warfare.” The Heritage

Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/2018_IndexOfUSMilitary

Strength_CARAFANO.pdf.

Bulletin of ”Carol I” National Defence University

December 2022

Del, Stewart. 2017. “Victory Starts Here. A Short 45-Years History of the US Army Training and Doctrine

Command.” Combat Studies Institute Press. US Army Combined Arms Center, Fort Leavenworth,

Kansas.

History.com Editors. 2018. Yom Kippur War. https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/yom-kippur-war.

Hooker, Richard D. Jr., and Christopher Coglianese. 1993. “Operation Weserubung and the Origins

of Joint Warfare.” National Defence University. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic

Studies, Fort Lesley J. McNair. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA528871.pdf.

Malkasian, Carter. 2014. “Air land Battle and Modern Warfare.” International Forum on War History:

Proceedings.

Murray, Williamson. 2002. The Evolution of Joint Warfare. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/

a426537.pdf.

Rice, Mark A. Lieutenant/USN. 2007. THE PRACTICE OF OPERATIONAL ART IN OPERATION

WESERUBUNG: The German invasion of Norway in 1940. Newport: Naval War College. https://

apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA470823.pdf.

Skinner, Douglas. 1988. “Airland Battle Doctrine.” Center for Naval Analysis, Virginia. https://apps.

dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA202888.pdf.

TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1. 2018. The US Army in multi-domain operations 2028. https://adminpubs.

tradoc.army.mil/pamphlets/TP525-3-1.pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-01-16

How to Cite

CUCINSCHI, A. ., & CHIORCEA, . I. . (2023). JOINT OPERATIONS – THE CONTINUITY OF A FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENT . BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY, 11(4), 36–42. Retrieved from https://revista.unap.ro/index.php/bulletin/article/view/1613

Issue

Section

Articles