AN ATTEMPT TO EXPLORE THE POTENTIAL FOR CHANGE IN RUSSIA’S DOMESTIC SYSTEM AND ITS FOREIGN POLICY: LESSONS ON THE COLD WAR END
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-22-79Keywords:
Cold War;, ; foreign policy;, geopolitics, ; Russia, USSR, USA, NATOAbstract
The Cold War is not an event, it seems, but a process that continues nowadays, too. In this scholarly article, we defend the thesis that the asymmetric end of the Cold War left a lasting memory on Russia‘s foreign policy. In developing this thesis,
we proceed as follows: firstly, we will outline the realist counterargument to our thesis which suggests that no lessons can be learned from the ending of the Cold War because the bipolar struggle itself and the period after were continuations of the
constant struggle for power between states in which historical narratives and ideas have no part to play. Secondly, building on the existing constructivist perspective, we will show that understanding the different ideational frameworks that developed
in Washington and Moscow are paramount to understanding the deterioration of Russia’s relations with the West in the past decade. Thirdly, we will show how the narratives that developed within Russia about the ending of the Cold War and Russia’s
place in the world are critical to understanding the potential for change in the domestic system.
References
Donaldson, Robert, Vidya Nadkarni, and Joseph Nogee. 2014. Тhe Foreign Policy of Russia: Changing
Systems, Enduring Interests. 5th edition. London: Routledge.
Fish, Steven. 2018. ”What Has Russia Become?” Comparative Politics, 50 (3): 327-346. Accessed
August 19, 2022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26532689.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Penguin Random House.
Gorbachev, Mikhail. 1989. Address given by Mikhail Gorbachev to the Council of Europe. Accessed
August 19, 2022. https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2002/9/20/4c021687-98f9-4727-9e8b836e0bc1f6fb/publishable_en.pdf.
Bulletin of ”Carol I” National Defence University
September 2022 37
Lankina, Tomila, and Kohei Watanabe. 2017. ”Russian Spring or Spring Betrayal? The Media as a
Mirror of Putin’s Evolving Strategy in Ukraine.” Europe-Asia Studies, 69 (10): 1526-1556. Accessed
August 19, 2022. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09668136.2017.1397603.
McFaul, Michael. 2014. ”Faulty Powers: Who Started the Ukraine Crisis?” Foreign Affairs, 167-
Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/eastern-europecaucasus/2014-10-17/faulty-powers.
Mearsheimer, John. 2012. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Monaghan, Andrew. 2011. ”The Russian Vertikal: the Tandem, Power and the Elections.” Russia and
Eurasia Programme Paper REP 2011/01. Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.chathamhouse.
org/sites/default/files/19412_0511ppmonaghan.pdf .
Morozov, Viatcheslav. 2015. Russia’s Postcolonial Identity: A Subaltern Empire in a Eurocentric World.
London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Neumann, Iver. 2016. Russia and the Idea of Europe. London: Routledge.
—. 1998. Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. Mineapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Pouliot, Vincent. 2010. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reuters. 2009. Clinton, Lavrov Push Wrong Reset Button on Ties. Geneva. Accessed August 19, 2022.
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN06402140.
Sakwa, Richard. 2016. Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I. B. Tauris.
Stent, Angela. 2015. The Limits of Partnership. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Stoner, Kathryn. 2021. Russia Resurrected: Its Power and Purpose in a New Global Order. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Tang, Shiping. 2009. ”The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis.” Security Studies, 18 (3): 587-623.
Accessed August 19, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410903133050.
Thies, Wallace. 2012. Why NATO Endures? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsygankov, Andrey. 2019. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. 5th
edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Wallender, Celeste. 2000. ”Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War.” International
Organizations: The MIT Press, 54 (4): 705-735. Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.jstor.org/
stable/2601379.
Walt, Stephen. 2018. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of
U.S. Primacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Waveland Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1995. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
White, Stephen, and Valentina Feklyunina. 2014. Identities and Foreign Policies in Russia, Ukraine and
Belarus. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wohlforth, William. 1994. ”Realism and the End of The Cold War.” International Security , 19 (3): 91-129.
Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539080
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The published articles are subject to copyright law. All rights are reserved to the “Carol I” National Defense University, regardless of whether all or part of the material are considered, especially the rights to translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, quotations, broadcasting through the media, reproduction on microfilms or any other way and storage in data banks. Any replicas without the associated fees are authorized provided the source is acknowledged.
BULLETIN OF "CAROL I" NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY 
