PUBLIC COMMUNICATION IN PURSUING AND PROMOTING THE INTERESTS OF SECURITY ACTORS – A TAXONOMIC APPROACH

Authors

  • Iulia Cojocaru ”Carol I” National Defence University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-22-72

Keywords:

public communication, influence;, strategic communication;, persuasion;, manipulation

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the best ways to support security actors in the process of promoting and pursuing their interests, through public communication. In this respect, we have considered it relevant to identify and present the forms of public
communication most often used in the information environment for the purpose of influencing power games, and we have classified them into two categories: constructive and destructive, taking into account ethical aspects in terms of transmitter’s
intentionality, as well as the whole set of effects that they produce on the security environment (direct effects – short term, and indirect effects – long term), on its dynamics, and ultimately on the world order. Following our analysis, we will have
identified strategic communication (and the techniques derived from it) as the form of public communication whose whole set of effects generated suits the interests of the actor – transmitter, the citizen – as an exponent of international society –, as
well as the ideal of peace.

References

Bayou, Mohamed E., and Eric Panitz. 1993. ”Definition and Content of Persuasion in Accounting.” 9

(3): 44-51. https://www.proquest.com/docview/227592992?accountid=88069.

Chelcea, Septimiu. 2006. Opinia publică. Strategii de persuasiune și manipulare. București: Editura Economică.

Deac, Ioan. 2003. „Tehnici de relații publice.” Curs. https://www.academia.edu/35699879/IOAN_DEAC_TEHNICI_DE_RELAȚII_PUBLICE_CURS.

DEX online. n.d. Accessed June 05, 2022. https://dexonline.ro.

Gass, Robert H., and John S. Seiter. 2018. Persuasion Social Influence and Compliance Gaining. New York: Routledge. doi:http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315209302.

Larson, Charles U. 2003. Persuasiunea. Receptare și responsabilitate. București: Editura Polirom.

Leseniuc, Adrian. 2017. Teorii ale comunicării. Brașov: Editura Academiei Forțelor Aeriene „Henri Coandă”.

Lungu, Ciprian, Ruxandra Buluc, and Ioan Deac. 2018. Promovarea culturii de securitate. București: Editura Top Form.

McPeck, John E. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. Londra: Routledge. doi:https://doi.

org/10.4324/9781315463698.

NATO. 2008. ”ACO Directive number 95-2.” ACO Strategic Communications, NATO Supreme

Headquarters Allied Powers Europe. https://indianstrategicknowledgeonline.com/web/NATOstratcom_15sep2008.pdf.

Figure 3 Placing persuasion, manipulation and strategic communication in the influence spectrum Source: Author conception

Bulletin of ”Carol I” National Defence University 48 June, 2022

Roșcan, Alina, and Ioan Deac. 2018. Comunicare și influențare socială. București: Editura Centrul tehnic-editorial al armatei.

Serviciul Român de Informații. n.d. “Fake News #awareness.” Accessed June 05, 2022. https://sri.ro/assets/files/publicatii/awareness-fake-news.pdf.

Stănciugelu, Irina. 2009. Măștile comunicării. De la etică la manipulare și înapoi. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Irina-Marsh/publication/259969605_Mastile_comunicarii_De_la_etica_la_manipulare_si_inapoi/links/0046352ebb7e90e619000000/Mastile-comunicarii-De-la-etica-lamanipulare-si-inapoi.pdf.

Stănciugelu, Irina, Raluca Tudor, Adriana Tran, and Vasile Tran. 2014. Teoria comunicării. București: Editura Tritonic.

Stratcomcoe. n.d. ”About Strategic Communications.” NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Accessed February 16, 2021. https://stratcomcoe.org/about_us/about-strategiccommunications/1.

University of Louisville. n.d. “What is Critical Thinking?” Accessed May 24, 2022. https://louisville.

edu/ideastoaction/about/criticalthinking/what

Downloads

Published

2022-07-05

Issue

Section

Articol