ROMANIAN`S SECURITY: EXPLAINING YOUNG CITIZENS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT NATIONAL SECURITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2668-5094-21-05Keywords:
Generation Z; security perception, Romania, national security.Abstract
Abstract: In the last decades the issue of national security has become more transparent and a subject of interest for the common citizen. Much scholarly attention is paid to how people perceive national security and issues related to it. However, we know very little about what young citizens, members of generation Z, believe about this aspect. This paper addresses this gap in the literature and analyzes how young citizens perceive subjects related to national security. It uses Romania as a single-case study and semi-structured interviews conducted in January 2021-March 2021 with young citizens coming from different socio-demographic profiles, to explain the variation in how they understand national security. The paper seeks to test the explanatory power of several variables such as knowledge about contemporary events, media exposure and threat assessment. The paper also controls for several socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education and medium of residence. The findings indicate that citizens’ perceptions are influenced by a combination of general attitudes towards the political system and society, the education factor and specific attitudes about potential threats.
References
Addor, M.L., Generation Z: What Is the Future of Stakeholder Engagement?,
Institute for EMERGING ISSUES - NC State University, 2011.
https://iei.ncsu.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2013/01/GenZStakeholders2.pdf.
Adecco, Millennials vs. Gen Z: Key Differences in The Workplace, 2016.
https://www.adeccousa.com/employers/resources/generation-z-vsmillennials-
infographic/.
Altemeyer B., The Authoritarian Specter, Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 1996.
Ayoob M., Defining Security: A Subaltern Realist Perspective, in "Critical
Security Studies", edited by Keith Krause and Michael C. William, 121–46.
New York, 2002.
Balzacq T., Constructivism and Securitization Studies, in "The Routledge
Handbook of Security Studies", edited by Myriam Dunn Cavelty and Victor
Mauer. London: Routledge, 2009.
Bennett J., Pitt M., Price S., Understanding the Impact of Generational Issues
in the Workplace, "Facilities" 30, no. 7/8 (2012): 278–88.
Bolser K., Gosciej R., Millennials: Multi-Generational Leaders Staying
Connected, "Journal of Practical Consulting 5", no. 2 (2015): 1–9.
Brunton-Smith I., Sturgis P., DO NEIGHBORHOODS GENERATE FEAR OF
CRIME? AN EMPIRICAL TEST USING THE BRITISH CRIME SURVEY*,
"Criminology"49, no. 2 (2011): 331–69.
Bryman A., Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, 2012.
Burke B., Kosloff S., Landau M., Death Goes to the Polls: A Meta-Analysis
of Mortality Salience Effects on Political Attitudes, "Political Psychology" 34
(2013): 183–200.
Gadarian S.K., The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign
Policy Attitudes, The Journal of Politics 72, no. 2 (2010): 469–83.
Gibson J., Gouws A., Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments
in Democratic Persuasion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Gutierrez A., Agullo Tomas E., Suarez Rodriguez J., Discursos Juveniles
Sobre Inmigración: Un Análisis Psicosociológico En Estudiantes de ESO.
"Psicothema" 16, no. 3 (2004): 384–90.
Hajli N., A Study of the Impact of Social Media on Consumers, "International
Journal of Market Research" 56, no. 3 (2013): 387–404.
Hawkins V., The Other Side of the CNN Factor: The Media and Conflict,
Journalism Studies 3, no. 2 (2002): 225–40.
Huddy L., Feldman S., Capelos T., Provost C., The Consequences of
Terrorism: Disentangling the Effects of Personal and National Threat,
"Political Psychology" 23, no. 3 (2002): 485–509.
Huddy L., Feldman S., Lahav G., Taber C., Fear and Terrorism:
Psychological Reactions to 9/11, In "Framing Terrorism: The News Media,
the Government and the Public", edited by Norris Pippa, Kern Montague, and
Marion Just, 255–78. New York, 2003.
Huddy, L, Feldman S., Taber C., Lahav G., Threat, Anxiety, and Support of
Antiterrorism Policies, "American Journal of Political Science " 49, no. 3
(2005): 593–608.
Iyengar S., Framing Responsibility for Political Issues, "The Annals of the
American Academy of Political and Social Science" 546 (1996): 59–70.
Iyengar S., Lelkes Y., Levendusky M., Malhotra N., Westwood S.J., The
Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States,
"Annual Review of Political Science", Annual Reviews Inc., May 11, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.
Kuo F.E, Sullivan W.C., Environment and Crime in the Inner City: Does
Vegetation Reduce Crime?, "Environment and Behavior" 33, no. 3 (2001):
–67.
Marcus G.E., Sullivan J.L., Theiss-Morse E., Wood S.L., With Malice toward
Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments, "Cambridge Studies in
Public Opinion and Political Psychology", Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1995.
Merkley L., How Social Media Impacts Political Views, The Daily Universe,
https://universe.byu.edu/2020/08/06/social-media-use-impactspolitical-
views/.
Miceli R., Roccato M., Rosato R., Fear of Crime in Italy: Spread and
Determinants, "Environment and Behavior" 36, no. 6 (2004): 776–89.
Moser G., Levy-Leboyer C., Inadequate Environment and Situation Control:
Is a Malfunctioning Phone Always an Occasion for Aggression?,
"Environment and Behavior" 17, no. 4 (1985): 520–33.
Ozkan M., Solmaz B., The Changing Face of the Employees – Generation Z
and Their Perceptions of Work (A Study Applied to University Students),
"Procedia Economics and Finance" 26 (2015): 476–83.
Paris R., Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?, "International
Security" 26, no. 2 (2001): 87–102.
Parker K., Graf N., Igielnik R., Generation Z Looks a Lot Like Millennials on
Key Social and Political Issues, 2019.
Pinker S., Better Angels of Our Nature. New York: Harper Perennial, 2011.
RAND, Corporation, Millennials Worry Less About National Security Than
Baby Boomers Do—for Now, 2018. https://www.rand.org/blog/articles/
/06/millennials-worry-less-about-national-security.html.
Ridout T.N., Grosse A.C., Appleton A.M., News Media Use and Americans’
Perceptions of Global Threat, "British Journal of Political Science" 38, no. 4
(2008): 575–93.
Roche, Sebastian. Le Sentiment d’insécurité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de
France, 1993.
Roser M., Why Are We Working on Our World in Data?, Our World in Data,
https://ourworldindata.org/why-are-we-working-on-our-world-in-data.
Rosling H., Rosling O., Rosling Ronnlund A., Factfulness: Ten Reasons
We’re Wrong About the World - and Why Things Are Better Than You Think.
New York: Flatiron Books, 2018.
Rosner Z.A, Elman J.A., Shimamura A.P., The Generation Effect: Activating
Broad Neural Circuits during Memory Encoding, "Cortex; a Journal Devoted
to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior" 49, no. 7 (2013): 1901–9.
Schneier B., The Psychology of Security, In Progress in Cryptology –
AFRICACRYPT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by Serge
Vaudenay, 5023:50–79. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., Duckitt J., Effects of Dangerous and Competitive
Worldviews on Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance
Orientation over a Five-Month Period, "Political Psychology" 28, no. 3
(2007): 357–71.
Sniderman P., Hagendoorn L., Prior M., Predisposing Factors and Situational
Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities, "The American
Political Science Review" 98, no. 1 (2004): 35–49.
Winstanley P.A. de, Bjork E.L., Processing Instructions and the Generation
Effect: A Test of the Multifactor Transfer-Appropriate Processing Theory,
"Memory 5", no. 3 (1997): 401–21.
