NEW PERSPECTIVES OF SIMULATION MODELING IN THE OPERATIONAL ART OF MILITARY ACTION PLANNING THROUGH SOFT SYSTEMS METHODOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2668-2028-21-40Keywords:
Keywords: military action; operational art; societal fields; simulation modeling; soft systems methodology.Abstract
Abstract: The contemporary operational environment is mainly determined by the dynamics of the phenomena occurring within the connections of the societal fields. Decoding the reality and designing military actions have shifted to new coordinates of the operational art, in terms of the way the factors of influence that change the status of each societal field are jointly approached. The term societal has acquired new meanings in the context of the overconnectivity of the fundamental domains of the society which are the following: political/diplomatic, military, economic, social, medical – pandemic, infrastructural, informational, environmental and geo-strategic. The operational art of military action planning is based on decoding the operational environment and includes analyses with different level of detail depending on the approached societal field. The analyses result in different models of action of the opponent that involve organizing and reorganizing the friendly formations that will be planned to take part in operations. Deciding for or against certain options for resolving a (military) crisis situation takes place following repeated simulations until favorable results are obtained. In this article, we aimed to bring to the attention of the specialists in the field of military action planning the integrative methodology of "design thinking" the main aspects related to the impact of the dynamics of the societal domains network in the perspective of the simulated modeling in military action planning.
References
2. CHIFU Iulian, Decizia în criză, RAO Publishing House, Bucharest, 2019, ISBN 978-606-006-349-0.
3. DINCOVICI Cristian, colectiv, Manualul privind pregătirea întrunită de informaţii a mediului operational, MoD Publishing House, Bucharest, 2014.
4. GRĂDINARU Doruleț, et al, Simulări și proiecte de management, Editura Sitech, Craiova, 2007.
5. S.M.G./P.F.-5 Doctrina planificării operaţiilor în Armata României.
6. PEDERSON P., D. Dudenhoeffer, S. Hartley, M. Permann, Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of U.S. and International Research, The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance, Idaho National Laboratory, 2006.
7. https://sgg.gov.ro/new/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/CARTA-ALBA-A-APARARII.pdf
8. https://web.mit.edu/sysdyn/sd-intro/D-4165-1.pdf
9. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lums/people/peter-checkland
10. https://slulibrary.saintleo.edu/c.php?g=449435&p=3067618
11. https://slulibrary.saintleo.edu/c.php?g=449435&p=3067599
12. https://slulibrary.saintleo.edu/c.php?g=449435&p=3067613