NEW CHALLENGES REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONFIGURATION OF THE ARMORED CAPABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2668-2028-21-03Keywords:
Keywords: armored capabilities; modern battlefield requirements; firepower and protection; maneuverability; lethality and survivability; force projection.Abstract
Abstract: A new international security paradigm in the evolution of the international environment and modern battlefield requirements implies the reconsideration of the combat large-scale operations concept. Consequently, the need to reconsider this concept generates a number of imperatives in configuring and developing tactical force structures and formations. Flexibility, versatility, operational mobility, as well as the ability to survive in the tactical field are general but mandatory requirements for those forces. Armored forces, the main striking force of the tactical units must be versatile and adaptive in order to create the premises for gaining and maintaining initiative and ultimately generate the conditions to prevail on the battlefield. New technologies, peer enemy capabilities development, but also the need to create a responsive, credible and effective force represent the references that shapes today future armored capabilities.
References
2. BRAITHWAITE Rodric, AFGANSTY: The Russians in Afghanistan 1979-1989, Ed. Oxford University Press, USA, 2011.
3. SPRANG W. Ronald, MAJ, USA, The Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) In The Future: An Assessment Of Capabilities Against The Hybrid Threat In The Future Operational Environment, Master Of Military Art And Science, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2013.
4. ***, Strategia națională de apărare a țării pentru perioada 2020-2024, Bucharest, 2020.
5. ***, Carta Albă a Apărării, Bucharest, 2020.
6. ***, F.T.1, Doctrina operaţiilor forţelor terestre, SMFT, Bucharest, 2017.
7. ***, F.T.-3, Manualul de tactică generală a forțelor terestre, Bucharest, 2020.
8. ***, F.T./I.-1.1, Manualul pentru luptă al diviziei de infanterie, Bucharest, 2019.
9. ***, F.T./I.-1, Manualul pentru luptă al brigăzii mecanizate (infanterie, infanterie uşoară), Bucharest, 2005.
10. ***, AJP-1, Allied Joint Doctrine, Edition E, Version 1, February, 2017.
11. ***, AJP-3, Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations, Edition C, Version 1, February 2019.
12. ***, ATP-3.2.1, Allied Land Tactics, Edition B, Version 1, August 2018.
13. ***, ATP-3.2.2., Command and Control of Allied Land Forces, Edition B Version 1, December 2016.
14. ***, ADP 3-90, Offense and Defense, Headquarters, Department of the Army, USA, July 2019.
15. ***, ATP 3-91, Division Operations, Headquarters, Department of the Army, October 2014.
16. ***, ADP-6.0, Army Doctrine Publication – Mission Command, July 2019, Headquarters, Department of the Army, USA.
17. ***, Large-Scale Combat Operations - The Division Fight, US Army Command and General Staff College Press Book Published by the Army University Press, 2019.
18. ***, Framework for Future Alliance Operations, 2018, www.act.nato.int accessed on 11.01.2021.
19. ***, Strategic Foresight Analysis, Report, 2017,www.act.nato.int accessed on 14.01.2021.
20. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2017/9/29/tank-warfare-russia-builds-platform-to-rival-the-abrams
21. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_180627.htm
22. https://warontherocks.com/2016/04/outnumbered-outranged-and-outgunned-how-russia-defeats-nato/
23. https://www.benning.army.mil/armor/Cadet-Branching/content/PDF/Platoon%20 Structure .pdf?10JUN2020