RUSSIAN MILITARY DIVERSION – MASKIROVKA, USED IN THE BLACK SEA AREA

Authors

  • Roxana ALEXANDRU
  • Valentin-Costinel TOTIR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53477/2668-2028-21-17

Keywords:

Keywords: deception; diversion; interference; strategy; Black Sea; Maskirovka.

Abstract

Abstract: Taking into consideration the influence this doctrine has, being used in the maritime environment, over the Black Sea riparian countries, we consider that the analysis of its effects is an element of novelty and interest. The research methods used are observation, analysis and description. At the end of this article, we attempted to identify a pattern of the methods used to implement this doctrine in the Black Sea region. To this purpose, in order to identify the doctrine’s general framework, we will take into consideration threats and risks, indications and warnings. Through this approach, we wish to address specialists, researchers and students who want to analyze these issues and develop courses of action, in order to give an optimate response, in the conditions of a maritime or riverine threat.

Author Biography

Roxana ALEXANDRU

Date of birth, City/Country: May 27, 1983, Constanța / Romania

Higher education (undergraduate and graduate studies):

  • Bachelor degree in (field of study), awarded by (University), class of (year): Naval Engineering and Navigation, “Mircea cel Bătrân” Naval Academy, 2007

Relevant training courses: International Martitime Officers Course, USA Coast Guard Training Center, Yorktown, Virginia; Intelligence courses, NATO School Oberamergau, Germany, Introduction to NATO, Crisis Management courses, “Carol I” National Defense University, Bucharest, Romania.

Current position and affiliation: attending masters degree in Joint Command – Naval Forces, “Carol I” National Defense University, Bucharest, Romania

Research interests: intelligence, maritime domain, joint operations.

References

1. Oxford Dictionary, https://www.lexico.com/
2. The Soviet Army Operations and Tactics (FM 100-2-1), USA HQ Department of the Army, Washington D.C., 07/16/1984.
3. HERPEN Marcel van, „Putin’s Wars: the Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism”, Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.
4. PRUITT Sarah, “How a Five-Day War with Georgia Allowed Russia to Reassert Its Military Might”, History website, 09/04/2018.
5. “Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia” EU report, September 2009.
6. “Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities”, European Council report, Strasbourg, 04/02/2014.
7. HARDING Luke, “Spies, sleepers and hitmen: how the Soviet Union’s KGB never went away”, 11/19/2014.
8. VICE Margaret, “Russians Remain Confident in Putin’s Global Leadership”, Pew Research Center, 06/20/2017.
9. RÁCZ András, “Russia’s Hybrid War in Ukraine”, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
10. ASH Lucy, “How Russia outfoxes its enemies”, BBC, 01/29/2015.
11. PAUL,Christopher Miriam Matthews, “The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model”, Rand Corporation, 2016.
12. MAIER Morgan, “A Little Masquerade: Russia’s Evolving Employment of Maskirovka”, United States Army, School of Advanced Military Studies United States Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, 2016.
13. Russian President official website, http://en.kremlin.ru
14. European Union official website, www.europa.eu
15. European Council official website, www.coe.int
16. OSCE official website, www.osce.org
17. NATO official website, www.nato.int
18. Council on Foreign Relations, Global Conflict Tracker, New York, SUA, www.cfr.org

Downloads

Published

2021-07-21

Issue

Section

Articles