SOCIAL MEDIA IN INFORMATION WARFARE. ASSAULT WEAPON WITH HIGH RECOIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53477/2668-2001-21-32Keywords:
social media; StratCom; narrative; strategic communication; propaganda; fake news; informational war; Russia.Abstract
Beyond the benefits or risks of individual or institutional communication through social media, we must note that it is the perfect environment for fake news and propaganda because of the speed of information propagation, the unfriendly environment for checking sources, algorithms behind social networks and, last but not least, the extremely low cost. In other words, the Internet and web 2.0 have created the favorable framework for the conduct of the war "for minds and hearts", as it can be called the information war waged through social media. Beyond these considerations, the non-regulation of the online domain - the lack of rules, be they deontological, make social media a powerful weapon of attack in this type of war. At the same time, the use of this space by state actors should be done with caution because it involves risks that could result in the loss of the most important action capacity: credibility. This article aims to analyze social media as a tool in information warfare
References
Argenti, Paul A. 2009. Corporate Communication, McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Aristotle. 2007. Metaphysics, About Interpretation, translation Andrei Cornea, Bucharest. Humanitas Publishing House.
Aristotle. Rhetoric, bilingual edition, translation, introductory studies and index by Maria Cristina Andries, notes and comments Stefan Sebastian Matei, Iri Publishing House, Cogito collection.
Brazzoli, M. S. 2007. Future prospects of information warfare and particularly psychological operations. In L. le Roux (Ed.), South African army vision 2020. Pretoria, South Africa: Institute for Security Studies.
Christakis, Nicholas A. Dr., and Dr. James H. Fowler. 2009. Connected, Ed. Curtea Veche.
Cronin, B., & Crawford, H. 1999. Information warfare: Its application in military and civilian contexts. Information Society, 15 (4).
Davidson, M. A., & Yoran, E. 2007. Enterprise security for Web 2.0. Computer, 40 (11)
Ellul, Jacques. 1965. Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes, New York: Knopf.
Fry, Hannah. 2018. Hello world! Computer Revolution and the Future of Humanity, Corinth Future.
Merali, Y. 2006. Complexity and information systems: The emergent domain. Journal of Information Technology, 21 (4).
National Intelligence Council, 10th of March 2021, Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections, Intelligence Community Assessment, Declassified by DNI Haines on 15th of March 2021.
NATO ACO Directive (AD) 95-2 Strategic Communications, 21st of May 2012, Ronfeldt, D., & Arquilla, J. 1998. The Zapatista social netwar in Mexico. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
O'Reilly, T. 2005. What is Web 2.0? Online: http://oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=1, accessed on 19th December of 2020.
Potter, L. R. 1998. The Ten-Step Strategic Communication Plan, 1999 Yearbook of Global Communication, Madrid, Spain, October.
Prier, Jarred LTC. USAF. Commanding Trend: Social Media as Information Warfare.
RAND Europe. 2010. NATO's Strategic Communication Concept and its Relevance to France.
Silverman, Craig. 2016. This Analysis Shows How Viral Fake Election News Stories Outperformed Real News on Facebook.
Townsend, Tess. The Bizarre Truth behind the Biggest Pro-Trump Facebook Hoaxes.
United States Department of State, report. 1987. Soviet Influence Activities: A Report on Active Measures and Propaganda, 1986-87. Washington, DC: Bureau of Public Affairs.
