RUSSIAN ELECTRONIC WARFARE CAPABILITIES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR EUROPEAN STRATEGIC STABILITY: A CASE STUDY OF THE SYRIAN CONFLICT

Authors

  • Cristina Marzal
  • Guillem Colom-Piella

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53477/2668-2001-21-09

Keywords:

Syria; Russia; electronic warfare; NATO; military strategy

Abstract

The Russian intervention in Syria, as well as the associated deployment of electronic warfare systems, generated alarm among NATO members linked to the possibility that a strengthening of electronic warfare capabilities by Russia could reduce the current technological asymmetry in favor of NATO. Such reduction would come from the use of electronic warfare systems to hamper the command and control capacity of attack and defense systems. This paper analyses the Russian intervention in Syria in order to define whether it can be understood that there is an increasing risk to Euro-Atlantic security stemming from Russian advances in electronic warfare.

References

Beehner, Lionel et al. 2018. Analyzing the Russian Way of War Evidence from the 2008 Conflict with Georgia. West Point: Modern War Institute.

Bērzinš, Jānis. 2020. “The Theory and Practice of New Generation Warfare: The Case of Ukraine and Syria”. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 33 (3): 355-380 http://www.doi.org/ 10.1080/13518046.2020.1824109

C4ADS. 2019. Above Us Only Stars. Exposing GPS Spoofing in Russia and Syria. Washington DC: The Center for Advanced Defense Studies.

Collins, Liam. 2018. “Russia Gives Lessons in Electronic Warfare”. Association of the United States Army. Last modified July 26, 2018 https://www.ausa.org/articles/russia-gives-lessons-electronic-warfare Accessed 5 March 2021.

Dalsjö, Robert, Christofer Berglund and Michael Jonsson (eds.). 2020. Beyond Bursting Bubbles – Understanding the Full Spectrum of the Russian A2/AD Threat and Identifying Strategies for Counteraction. Stockholm: FOI.

Denisentsev, Sergey. 2014. “Okno vozmozhnostey dlya REB”. Voyenno-Promyshlennyy Kuryer 23 (541) http://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/20874 Accessed 2 March 2021.

Defense Intelligence Agency [DIA]. 2017. Russia Military Power: Building a Military to Support Great Power Aspirations. Washington, DC: Defence Intelligence Agency.

DFRLab. 2017. Russia’s Fake “Electronic Bomb”. How a fake based on a parody spread to the Western Mainstream. Last modified May 9, 2017 https://medium.com/dfrlab/russias-fake-electronic-bomb-4ce9dbbc57f8 Accessed 4 March 2021

Hamilton, Robert; Chris Miller and Aaron Stein (eds.). 2020. Russia’s War in Syria. Assessing Russian Military Capabilities and Lessons Learned. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute.

Jones, Seth (ed.). 2020. Moscow’s War in Syria. Washington DC: CSIS.

Kjellén, Jonas. 2018. Russian Electronic Warfare. The Role of Electronic Warfare in the Russian Armed Forces. FOI-R-4625-SE. Stockholm: FOI.

Kofman, Michael. “Russian A2/AD: It is not overrated, just poorly understood”. Russia Military Analysis. Last modified January 25, 2020https://russianmilitaryanalysis.wordpress.com/ 2020/01/25/russian-a2-ad-it-is-not-overrated-just-poorly-understood/ Accessed 7 March 2021.

Kofman, Michael et al. 2017. Lessons from Russia’s Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

McCrory, Duncan. 2021. “Russian Electronic Warfare, Cyber and Information Operations in Ukraine.” The RUSI Journal, http://www.doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2021.1888654

McDermott, Roger. 2017. Russia’s Electronic Warfare Capabilities to 2025: Challenging NATO in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Tallinn: International Centre for Defence and Security.

McDermott, Roger. 2019. Russian Navy Procures New Electronic Warfare Capabilities. Washington DC: The Jamestown Foundation, https://jamestown.org/program/russian-navy-procures-new-electronic-warfare-capabilities/ Accessed 7 March 2021.

Radin, Andrew et al. 2019. The Future of the Russian Military: Russia’s Combat Capabilities and Implications for U.S.-Russia Competition. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

Ramm, Alexei. 2015a. “Elektronnaya vojna, mify i pravda (part I)”. Voyenno-Promyshlennyy Kuryer 37 (603) https://vpk-news.ru/articles/27272 Accessed 3 March 2021.

Ramm, Alexei. 2015b. “Elektronnaya voyna, mify i pravda (part 2)”. Voyenno-Promyshlennyy Kuryer 38 (604) http://vpk-news.ru/articles/27410 Accessed 3 March 2021.

Seligman, Lara. 2018. “Russian Jamming Poses a Growing Threat to U.S. Troops in Syria”. Foreign Policy, 30 July https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/07/30/russian-jamming-poses-a-growing-threat-to-u-s-troops-in-syria/ Accessed 27 February 2021.

Sukhankin, Sergey. 2019. “Syrian Experience Provides New Impetus for Russia’s UAV Strategy (Part Two)”. Washington DC: The Jamestown Foundation, https://jamestown.org/program/syrian-experience-provides-new-impetus-for-russias-uav-strategy-part-two/ Accessed 7 March 2021.

Stupples, David. 2015. “How Syria is becoming a test zone for electronic warfare”. CNN. 9 October. https://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/09/opinions/syria-electronic-warfare-russia-nato/index.html Accessed 3 March 2021

Thomas, Timothy. 2014. “Russia’s Information Warfare Strategy: Can the Nation Cope in Future Conflicts?”. Journal of Slavic Military Studies 27 (1): 101-130. http://www.doi.org/ 10.1080/13518046.2014.874845

Turunen, Andreas. 2020. “The Broader Challenge of Russian Electronic Warfare Capabilities”. In Improvisation and Adaptability in the Russian Military, edited by Jeffrey Mankoff, 13-21. Washington DC: CSIS.

Urcosta, Ridvan Bari. 2020. “The Revolution in Drone Warfare: The Lessons from the Idlib De-Escalation Zone”. Air Force Journal of European, Middle Eastern & African affairs 3 (2): 50-65.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-01